The Government announced revising the GDP base year from 2011–12 to 2022–23, with MoSPI aiming for release by February 2026 .
A 26-member Advisory Committee on National Accounts Statistics (ACNAS), chaired by Biswanath Goldar—including RBI, central/state officials, academia—was formed to guide methodology and incorporate new data sources .
Why Transparency is Critical
Restoring Credibility: The 2015 revision faced criticism for over-reliance on corporate MCA-21 data, potentially overstating growth and eroding trust .
Global Standards Alignment: Frequent (every 5–10 years) base year updates align with UN/IMF recommendations, ensuring data comparability and reducing inflation biases .
Enhanced Policymaking: A reliable base year reflects actual economic structure—services, digital platforms, informal sector—vital for informed decisions .
Expert Recommendations for a Robust Process
Based on recent expert insights:
Methodological Clarity
Publish a technical white paper detailing:
Sector weight computation,
Deflator usage (preferably double deflation),
Back series methodology
Address past corporate bias and data gaps transparently .
Independent Third‑Party Reviews
Engage IMF, World Bank, academic peers for impartial assessments.
Encourage academic and civil society oversight .
Regular Scheduled Updates
Institutionalize base-year revisions every 5 years per National Statistical Commission norms—not skip cycles (like 2017–18) .
Hybrid Data Sources
Combine corporate (MCA‑21) and survey-based data (e.g., ASI, PLFS, CES).
Integrate administrative digital indicators (UPI, GST, EPFO) to capture informal economy growth .
Institutional Accountability
Empower NSC or MoSPI to own transparent communication.
Create a dedicated portal with:
Methodology,
Data releases,
Peer reviews to reinforce public trust .
Implications for Policy and Credibility
Economic Decision‑making: A transparent, accurate GDP base aids in setting budgets, evaluating sectoral growth, and calibrating fiscal/monetary strategy.
Investor Confidence: Reliable macro-data is key to attracting global investment and improving India’s economic ratings.
International Comparability: Aligning with global norms supports India’s positioning in G20, IMF, and multilateral dialogues.
UPSC Relevance
Theme
UPSC Focus
Economic Indicator Governance
GS3 – Data reliability, methodology in national accounting
International Standards
GS2/3 – IMF/UN standards and engagement
Institutional Framework
GS2 – NSC, MoSPI roles, panel accountability
Policy Efficacy
GS3 – Data quality’s impact on macroeconomic decisions
Suggested UPSC Mains Question
Q:“Revising the GDP base year enhances policy formulation and global credibility. Critically analyze the issues in India’s base year revisions so far and suggest measures to strengthen the process.”
Approach: Define GDP base-year; assess need and impact; examine past challenges (2015 MCA bias, skipped cycles, data gaps); propose measures (methodology, reviews, regularity); conclude on policy and investment significance.
1 responses on "GDP Base Year Update: Need for Transparency"